Nomos-TV’s Private Chat Room: A Look Inside Alexandre Cormier-Denis and His Acolytes’ Racist Safe Space

An anti-fascist source infiltrated the private chat room of Nomos-TV subscribers. What’s on the agenda and within the comfort zone of this “safe space”? The answer is: unbridled xenophobia and Islamophobia; open contempt for the people of Québec, seniors, civic nationalism, and progressive sovereigntists; misogyny and transphobic hatred; and, of course, a constant stream of degrading remarks about migrants and people of color. In a context where certain reactionary elements of the mainstream media, particularly the Québecor empire, play into the hands of these racist activists by offering them a platform, using the pretext of free speech, we are taking the opportunity to present some of the findings from this undercover operation, reminding everyone—once again—that we will never accept the spread of hate speech in our communities, no matter what the useful idiots and apologists may say.

///

 

Subterfuge And Complacency: How Hate Speech Is Normalized

It will soon be eight months since we published a detailed exposé about Alexandre Cormier-Denis (ACD), in which we demonstrated the key role played by this ethnonationalist ideologue in Québec’s far-right ecosystem and the deeply racist and xenophobic nature of his political platform. After ten years of this sort of activity, you would think that anything remotely connected to Cormier-Denis and Nomos-TV would be persona non grata in the mainstream media.

While in Québec in 2026 the intense hatred of left-wing voices has become widespread in mainstream culture, the mass of hate speech that ACD pumps out is completely ignored by certain reactionary media personalities, who still choose to hand him the microphone and amplify his message rather than acknowledge what is going here or recognize in any way the work of anti-fascists and progressive journalists.

As a result, ACD and Nomos-TV continue to benefit from an outrageous degree of tolerance—even open sympathy—in certain corners of Québec’s media ecosystem, including Radio X (which has long since become the main mouthpiece for the entire right wing), as well as on platforms such as the YouTube channel Ian & Frank (which leans toward “libertarian” conservatism, and which “Nomosians” openly despise in private) and Radio Ville-Marie, whose director openly displays his affinity with ACD. On April 27, we witnessed a striking example of this complacency. QUB Radio host Benoît Dutrizac invited Cormier-Denis to give his account of what had happened a few days earlier,[1] when a Front antifasciste populaire mobilization at the Nomos-TV studio in the Plateau Mont-Royal neighborhood prevented ACD’s live broadcast.

Although he denies it, Dutrizac has chosen to play a role in normalizing this key Québec far-right figure and, above all, in trivializing the xenophobic rhetoric that lies at the heart of ACD’s ideological platform. Dutrizac is well aware of this, as he begins his conversation with ACD by sarcastically claiming that his career “is over” because he is associating with the “controversial” ACD, who responds by congratulating him for his “courage.”

Dutrizac then sets the stage by lashing out at “the left” and groundlessly smearing and demonizing anti-fascists (whom he alleges killed Charlie Kirk and attempted to assassinate Donald Trump, among other things). So it’s clear from the outset where this interview is going.

There’s no denying that ACD is a skilled demagogue: he carefully hides behind a “legalistic” façade to obscure his affiliation with the far right, treating it as a purely extralegal phenomenon—a clear distortion of reality. In the same spirit of subterfuge, during his appearance on QUB Radio, ACD did not hesitate to distort the ethnonationalist agenda he constantly defends by asserting that, for him, “a Quebécois is anyone who lives in Québec”—the old slogan of civic nationalism. The subtext, however, focuses on defending the “national preference” of the “race”—the French-Canadian ethnic majority—which is supposedly threatened by immigration, and which must remain dominant among the “Quebécois.” Thus, on QUB, he conveniently avoids specifying that a central element of his plan for the Québec nation-state would be “repatriating” anyone who is not of French-Canadian descent. All of this is clearly part of his strategy of presenting a “palatable” image in order to better deliver his “radical” message.

Journalists who unquestioningly accept ACD’s superficial arguments and dishonest answers without taking into account the entirety of his work and the specific nature of his remarks automatically become his useful idiots, even his accomplices. The “Nomosians” know this very well and have, in fact, congratulated themselves on having persuaded Dutrizac’s researcher Cybèle Olivier to invite him on the show. As we will see later, this is not the first time she has colluded with the small Nomos-TV circle.

In this context, it is important to continue gathering evidence of the extreme toxicity of ACD and his followers, in the hope that the mainstream media will see reason and re-establish the necessary cordon sanitaire around his “ethnonationalism,” which is, by definition, racist and xenophobic.

***

In the April 27 interview, Dutrizac asked ACD the following question:

[Are you afraid that your comments might veer into outright racism, that people might say, ‘All these immigrants—we need to kick them all out! Anyone who isn’t white and Catholic—we need to throw them all out!’ Aren’t you afraid of sparking that kind of simplistic thinking?]

In this article, you will find a clear answer to that question. This is exactly what the hosts and subscribers of Nomos-TV believe and obsessively repeat.

Over the course of several months, we have compiled a selection of the content from private discussions between ACD and Nomos-TV subscribers. Below we present a sampling of these repugnant exchanges. We can only hope that this article helps to expose the duplicity ACD engages in to gain access to certain mainstream spaces and to dispel any ambiguity regarding the true nature of Nomos, its hosts, and its subscribers. For practical reasons, we can only show a tiny fraction of the colossal amount of information we’ve gathered, but rest assured that we’ve kept it all.

///

 

Who are they? An overview of the members of the nomos private chat room

As of this writing, Nomos’s private Telegram “discussion group” has 193 members. These are paying subscribers to the Nomos-TV channel who have made donations over a period of at least three consecutive months.

It should first be noted that this paid private chat room is an extension of Nomos’s “public” chat room, which was created in April 2021 and now serves solely as a bulletin board for ACD and his associates, much like Nomos’s official Telegram channel, which has 3,794 members. In other words, the “public” chat room is redundant and largely pointless, since the discussions that once took place there—which were, and still quite often are, hateful in nature—have largely moved to the private chat group, away from prying eyes.

The private chat room, of which ACD is the sole “owner” and moderator, is divided into twenty-four smaller themed chat rooms: “General,” “Québec,” “Federal,” “Geopolitics,” “United States,” “Activism,” “Catholic,” “Family,” and onward to rooms with more lifestyle-oriented topics, such as “Health,” “Sports,” “Music,” “Video Games,” etc.

The “General” and “Québec” chat rooms are where most of the interaction takes place, but the other chat rooms are also used to varying degrees. Presumably as a precautionary measure, the content of the discussions automatically disappears after a week. Everything suggests that this measure was implemented following the revelations made in our December 2022 article about French police officer Auxane Jonot and his indiscretions in the Nomos chat room. As we shall see below, every topic serves as a pretext to interpret everything and anything through an ethnonationalist lens, to badmouth migrants, people of color, Muslims, and progressives, and to promote a one-size-fits-all solution: remigration.

The space where hatred—racial hatred in particular—is most explicitly on display is the “Meme” chat room. Here, we find ourselves squarely within an extension of the transgressive aesthetic of the 4Chan message board, rooted in the crude and malicious humor and falsely ironic hate propaganda that has brought the alt-right movement its infamy.

 

(Warning: many items in this carousel contain explicitly racist and hateful content.)

 

Of the 193 members currently subscribed, the vast majority use pseudonyms, but a significant number display their real names and/or faces, including David Leroux, who writes for the magazine L’Action nationale and is a Nouvelle Alliance activist (he rarely posts), and the “journalist ” Julien Garon-Carrier, who actively participates in discussions (see the section dedicated to him below). White supremacist Daniel Conversano and “re-informer” Nicolas Faure, close French collaborators of Cormier-Denis, are also registered. There are also a number of other French subscribers. Raphaël “Raph Stomper” Lévesque of Atalante Québec, who seems to has become an increasingly peripheral figure in the Québec far-right ecosystem, is also listed. A certain Alexandre Gauthier, a tattoo artist from Baie-Comeau, claims to be a case worker at a youth center. A Frederick Carignan explains on Facebook that he published an article for the French magazine Causeur. Some reckless individuals even post their phone numbers! Again, due to space constraints, we can only publish a sample.

Based on our observations, they seem to almost all be men of varying ages, with a significant majority of millennials. Women are the exception; only one (“Matricariat Chamomilla,” whose real name is Audrey Tessier, an accountant and traditionalist Catholic from the Québec City area) regularly participates in the discussions. It is worth noting that she is quite often the target of contempt and derision from certain other members, including the user “Fretretoc,” who does a poor job of hiding his rabid misogyny.

In addition to Cormier-Denis, the most active members—and those who generally set the tone of the discussions—are: “Gaulois d’Amérique” (same username on X, see below), “Frèretoc 23” (“Cacahuete Libre” on X), “Chat BBQ Haïtien” (“Sinus atténué” on X; his pseudonym is a reference to the canard promoted by the Trump campaign during the 2024 presidential election regarding Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, who were accused of eating pets), Julien Garon-Carrier (see below), “Charlemagne,” “La beauté pour nous sauver,” “El Duderino,” “Vrai_Sam,” “Anton Archant” (presumably French), “Nationaliste Du63” (who appears to boast of having a law degree), “Lupercal” (who expresses admiration for Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, a central figure of Futurism and coauthor of the Fascist Manifesto), “Jackie Estacado,” “Séraphin Poudrier” (who once used a portrait of Benito Mussolini as his avatar), “Merci” (from the Telegram channel “Merci la philosophie”), and about a dozen others. More than three-quarters of the subscribers participate little or not at all in the discussions.

 

The Nature Of The Discussions

Let’s be clear from the outset: there appears to be virtually no moderation in the chat room, in other words, no limits are imposed on the discussions. No guidelines or rules for civil discourse are posted anywhere. It’s the Wild West. Throughout the entire period we monitored the group’s activity, we did not see a single negative reaction to explicitly hateful comments, which are extremely frequent and ubiquitous. In fact, they are the norm, or are at least completely normalized. The only call to order observed concerned insults between members.

Not all subscribers necessarily agree with everything other subscribers say, and some exchanges are more heated than others, as we shall see later, but there is a general consensus on the key topics. We invite you to take note of ACD’s like on some of the most despicable screenshots presented in this article.

Ethnic nationalism, and by extension, the outright rejection of immigration and the fixation on remigration, explicitly manifesting as a racist and xenophobic mindset, is the fundamental lens through which everything is interpreted, analyzed, and understood. It is a veritable obsession bordering on a psychological fixation: the be-all and end-all of geopolitics, philosophy, cinema, health care, and so on. Without the ethnic criterion, there is apparently no salvation to be hoped for.

This generally manifests as explicit hatred or contempt for all groups that do not belong to “the race”—i.e., the reference nation or people: white French Canadians of European descent. It’s worth noting that ACD and his group organize what they proudly call “Saint-Jean de la Race” every year. Speaking of racism, one subscriber asked whether it would better to “impose a definition of ‘racism’ that included anti-white racism or to instead try to argue that racism is a good thing.” Elsewhere, Julien Garon-Carrier asserts that the ethnic consciousness of the French-Canadian people can only be awakened by great suffering, which he seems basically to hope for.

Few people really find favor with the “Nomosians” in this in-group, not even those who broadly share their worldview: a strict reactionary and xenophobic ethnic nationalism with an illiberal and fascist horizon. Others are the target of constant attacks of all kinds, first and foremost all those they consider “leftists,” which for them is anyone to the left of conservative nationalists like Mathieu Bock-Côté (who is himself not immune to ridicule) and his protégé Étienne-Alexandre Beauregard. Even they, due to their proximity to the Parti Québécois, are sometimes accused of “leftism.”

The left in all its forms and variations, from the most moderate to the most radical, are entirely demonized, and socially progressive ideas are all but systematically dismissed as clear signs of mental illness or intellectual deficiency. For these people, “leftism”—i.e., the “shitty communism we have to put up with every day”—is as intense an obsession as is immigration.

 

Civic nationalist parties whose emphasis on identity is not strong enough for their liking (CAQ, PQ, Bloc Québécois) are also sneered at. (All things considered, however, the CAQ is better than the PQ, according to ACD, and it was in Bernard Drainville that the “Nomosians” faction placed their hopes in the recent leadership race.) The same applies to the “libertarian” right, whose conservatism is primarily focused on preserving the material privileges of the middle class. According to ethnonationalists, the priority given to the economy by Éric Duhaime and the Parti conservateur du Québec allows for too much openness to immigration and places them in the “replacementist” camp.

A similar contempt is reserved for conservative influencers who do not share “Nomosian” obsessions. In the case of the podcasters Ian & Frank, for example, Ian Sénéchal, who is more libertarian than nationalist, is judged very harshly (he is given various nicknames, such as “Ian Senegal,” “Ian the Jackal,” etc.), while François Fournier (alias Frank), who is more receptive to identitarian arguments, is viewed somewhat more positively. QUB host Rémi Villemure, who had Cormier-Denis on his podcast, is, nonetheless, not spared the hostility of certain “Nomosians,” one of whom called him “shit.” Other conservative figures, such as Richard Martineau, Léo Dupire of Fier Québec, Christian Dufour, etc., don’t fare much better. Benoît Dutrizac, who showed great openness by inviting ACD onto his show, is classified as “far-center.”

Even the people of Québec are often openly disparaged and called all sorts of names, in particular because they apparently don’t vote the “right” way. The most virulent hatred is directed at boomers and women.

It should be noted that the “Nomosians” see the democratic process—and of democracy in general—as completely outdated and useless, starting with Cormier-Denis, who states bluntly that we should “not give a damn” about it. Women’s suffrage, in particular, is presented as the “beginning of the decline of civilization.” When the user “Frèretoc” suggests that seniors should have their right to vote taken away, ACD responds that the problem is “not just seniors,” but also “young people, women, and immigrants.” Obviously, these are things they can discuss among themselves, but which must be “shunned like the plague” in “the public sphere.” Another user speaks of the importance of “pushing criticism toward the post-democratic.” They may well deny being fascists, but the recurrence of this illiberal stance leaves little doubt about the true nature of their ethos.

Women (referred to by some “Nomosians” as “egg-layers”) and LGBTQ+ people are commonly disparaged—which comes as no surprise—however, as the discussions unfold, trans people are among those who face the most intense hatred. They are literally perceived and described as “monsters.”

Predictably, however, “Nomosians” reserve their greatest vitriol for immigrants, people of color, and Muslim communities. Indigenous communities are not spared.

While ACD and some of his followers may deny being antisemitic, others engage in open and utterly unrestrained antisemitism and face no moderation or genuine opposition, except for the assertion that crude antisemitism is a counterproductive distraction from advancing the ethnonationalist agenda. Despite regular references to “Jewry” in pejorative or dismissive terms, the “Jewish question” is more a matter of strategic discussion than a genuine point of contention. While some view Jews as inherently treacherous, others see them merely as “unreliable allies.” Be that as it may, as the discussions unfold, anti-Jewish stereotypes and antisemitic jokes (including caricatures reminiscent of those used by the Nazis) are never far away.

Heated debates among subscribers are, in fact, fairly rare. Debates that do occur include issues like whether it’s better to have leftists or people of color as neighbours. ACD weighs in: he’d rather have “a bourgeois bohemian neighbour who votes for QS than a North African or a Black person”; he’d prefer that “our daughters marry PQ voters rather than Muslims”; he thinks that “an incompetent leftist is better than a moronic African.”

One of the most heated debates centers on the thorny question of whether it is better not to reproduce at all (the pro-racial purity stance) than to have mixed-race children with people of color (the pro-natalist conservative stance). It is reasonable to assume that this question will remain purely rhetorical for the “Nomosians.”

Some of the most vicious attacks are directed specifically at the subscriber “Matricaria”—one of the few women in the group and by far the most active—and focus on the role of women as well as her fervent religious devotion, which is occasionally subject to ridicule.

ACD Among Friends

There’s not much to say about Cormier-Denis that we haven’t already said. Despite his eloquence, his breadth of knowledge, and his communication skills, he basically remains a one-dimensional figure. We invite you to read or reread our article from last October for more on that subject.

Given that ACD’s racism is well established—even based solely on his public statements—no one should be surprised by the liberties he takes in private. It is still the case that the contrast here is even more striking when the “palatable” image he seeks to project when appearing in mainstream media is taken into consideration.

It is worth noting that ACD does not hesitate to aggressively instrumentalize his community. In fact, this is how he managed to get invited onto Dutrizac’s show in April; he mobilized his followers to lobby the QUB Radio researcher. Following this successful operation, ACD also asked his followers to write to Dominic Maurais at Radio X to suggest that he follow suit. Elsewhere, he proposes as “activist work” that they contribute to his crusade against the progressive lawyer Frédéric Bérard, who has filed a complaint regarding the anonymous death threats he received after ACD linked him on social media to “antifas,” in the wake of President Trump’s executive order designating the antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization” in September 2025.

One might think that his persistent use of the word Bolshevik to describe anti-fascists is merely an innocent joke or a comical exaggeration, but ACD knows exactly what he is doing by seeking to revive this term, which no longer means anything substantial. He uses the slur against those who call him a fascist, even though he knows full well that he operates within the fascist ideological family and tradition. Everything he does is aimed at a single goal: to overturn the balance of power between what he calls “the cultural hegemony of the left”—a key component of which is the postwar anti-fascist consensus—and the “national right,” i.e., the far right. It is the same goal he pursued both following Charlie Kirk’s assassination and when he “threw down the gauntlet” and “kicked the antifa hive” in the in the immediate aftermath of the death of the young neo-Nazi Quentin Deranque last February. Incidentally, he fails to mention this episode when he rails against the “Bolsheviks” who greeted him outside the Nomos-TV studio on April 23.

It would be tedious and redundant to go over all of ACD’s problematic positions here, but we should at least mention his analysis of the war of aggression launched by the United States and Israel against Iran. Openly pro-Trump and largely pro-Zionist within the framework of an ethnonationalist analysis, ACD is one of the most prolific contributors to the Nomos “Geopolitics” discussion forum, where he and others speculate on the outcome of this war against the “Arabs” and the “Muslims.”

One of the lesser-known aspects of his work—which we touched upon in our previous article—is the prominence ACD enjoys in France. During his April visit to France to participate in the Institut Iliade (Nouvelle Droite) conference, ACD granted half a dozen interviews to various French far-right media outlets, including Frontières (to which he regularly contributes), Radio Courtoisie, YouTuber Vincent Lapierre, Daniel Conversano’s Les Braves channel, Antoine Dresse of the Ego Non channel, and Éléments, the flagship journal of the Nouvelle Droite (which notably dedicated the cover of its January 2026 issue to Mathieu Bock-Côté). He also delivered a speech at the launch of his friend Daniel Conversano’s book Racisme anti-Noir à travers les âges [Anti-Black Racism Throughout History]. While ACD is embraced as a prominent figure by far-right circles in France, it would appear that here at home some naive individuals have yet to see through the veil of euphemisms and evasions and understand where he truly stands.

To wrap up this section, we’ve included below a recent exchange from the chat room that reveals the hypocrisy ACD displays when he accuses “the left” of refusing to debate him. A subscriber suggests he debate a Québec-based influencer of Arab origin, which he categorically refuses on the pretext that it would confer legitimacy on his opponent (“Frèretoc,” for his part, says he prefers to preserve “racial purity” rather than consider “the arguments of an Arab”). It is precisely because we refuse to grant legitimacy to people like these that we will always refuse to debate fascists and racists of this ilk. Given that we think ACD clearly understands this, we hope to never again hear him criticize the anti-fascist left he denounces for refusing to debate him.

 

“Gaulois D’amérique”: Racist Boomer In Search of A Community

The user “Gaulois d’Amérique” is one of the chat room’s most active members, which is likely in part because, as he notes, he recently retired. We have chosen to highlight him as an example here because, in many ways, his utterly unapologetic racism makes him the quintessential Nomos user.

It’s a safe bet that he speaks less freely outside this safe space, which is why we chose to expose him to the public by exploiting the fatal error he made when he linked a photo of himself to his Telegram account.

Marc Villemaire, a resident of the Ahuntsic borough in Montréal, laments living in a community he describes as “replaced.”

Clearly having far too much free time on his hands, Villemaire is a notably prolific poster of racist and otherwise disgusting images in the “Meme” chat room. So prolific, in fact, that his trash regularly spills over into other chat rooms. Here is a substantial sample, to give you a sense of his moral bankruptcy.

Villemaire constantly shares articles, publications, and quotes from key figures from the French Nouvelle Droite and European identitarian movements, including Renaud Camus, the originator of the “Great Replacement” theory, Alain de Benoist, Jean-Yves Le Gallou, Guillaume Faye, and the journal Éléments; the Austrian Martin Sellner, a neo-Nazi associated with the identitarian movement; Italian identitarian movements; and, closer to home, the Telegram account of the journal Le Harfang, which shares posts from the Cercle Jeune nation, etc.

To make sure everyone understands exactly where he’s coming from, Villemaire has no qualms about displaying references to Nazism, including jokes about Hitler “waiting for you in heaven,” a portrait of Goebbels, and an illustration depicting National Socialism as a form of self-defence. Of course, the package wouldn’t be complete without a generous dose of antisemitism.

Finally, it should be noted that this racist boomer is a big fan of the militant nationalist splinter group Nouvelle Alliance. He has participated in several of its activities in recent years, including its failed rally on May 19, 2025, held at a safe distance from the statue of Dollard-des-Ormeaux in Lafontaine Park in Montréal; its Islamophobic rally in front of Notre-Dame Basilica on July 21; the conference hosted by NA with David Leroux and François Dumas in Trois-Rivières on October 4 of the same year, and the launch of Nouvelle Alliance’s magazine in Beloeil in March of this year. He also announced its next event, scheduled for May 18, which suggests he plans to attend.

Although he is retired, it is clear that Marc Villemaire of Ahuntsic, also known as “Gaulois d’Amérique,” is on the offensive on a number of fronts.

 

Julien Garon-Carrier

As surprising as it may seem, Cormier-Denis isn’t the only “Nomosian” to have been invited onto Benoît Dutrizac’s show recently. On March 3, the host welcomed “independent journalist and founder of Indocile Média” Julien Garon-Carrier onto his show to whine at length about the publication of the Fédération autonome de l’enseignement (FAE) report documenting the notable rise in homophobia, transphobia, and misogyny in Québec’s elementary and secondary schools.

We won’t dwell on the content of his remarks but, instead, on the circumstances that led to this complete unknown delivering his anti-woke rant on Dutrizac’s show. In the Nomos chat room, Garon-Carrier tells us that it was Dutrizac’s researcher Cybèle Olivier—her again—who wrote to invite him on! Pleased to have had “two or three moments of camaraderie” with Dutrizac, Garon-Carrier, nevertheless, feels he was “too radical” but is glad to have “at least been able to take a swipe at the university and leftist social sciences.” On the advice of his comrades, he confirms that he followed up with the researcher.

“Who is this random dude?” you might ask?” Good question.

Julien Garon-Carrier claims to be a “journalist and author” with a background in communications and political science who is committed to “defending free and uncompromising journalism.” As we shall see below, he is, above all, just another run-of-the-mill racist who masquerades as a respectable journalist to normalize the far right and promote a xenophobic ethnonationalist agenda in the public sphere.

On the Indocile Média website, Garon-Carrier describes his project as follows:

[At Indocile Media, we firmly believe that truth is the foundation of freedom. Our commitment to a radically free press is unwavering, and we reject any form of censorship or pressure that could compromise our mission. We firmly oppose dominant ideologies that seek to restrict critical thinking and free expression. Our motto, “in libertate veritas,” embodies our conviction that only the truth can truly liberate the mind and society.]

This ChatGPT-style verbosity suggests that the guy doesn’t realize he’s just a vapid windbag, a notion quickly confirmed when he participates in chatroom discussions. This is also the general impression conveyed by the “political intelligence services” he claims to offer to “mayors. . ., prefects, RCMs, chambers of commerce, etc.” in Québec. His explanation makes it clear that this so-called intelligence is largely artificial. One quickly gets the impression that this guy is punching well above his intellectual weight class, especially when he delivers conspiracy theory fantasies with an air of absolute certainty.

He is clearly pursuing a strategy of making his controversial ideas more palatable. For example, when he says he’s been invited on Qub Radio on a different occasion (we have found no trace of this supposed interview), he asked his colleagues how many times he should use the word remigration to “legitimize the concept.” As with all “Nomosian” thinkers, this is a recurring theme for him.

The rest of his comments are much the same. He hates the left, claims the CAQ is “suffocating us [with foreigners],” calls Laval the “scum of humanity,” and so on. As a true pseudo-intellectual, he appreciates and promotes racist pseudoscience (The Bell Curve), which naturally leads him to lament the existence of Black doctors, who “will be the scourge of Québec”:

A resident of Lévis, where he moved specifically to “be among a whiter population,” Garon-Carrier laments that despite his best efforts to avoid diversity, “they’re everywhere!” He says he was “traumatized” by seeing Black people at church during Easter Mass in Lévis, which leads ACD to lament the “great replacement in the churches.”

Elsewhere, expressing a blatant desire to undermine the democratic process in order to promote the ethnonationalist agenda, Garon-Carrier muses about the age at which the elderly—or young people—should be stripped of their voting rights. As for women, “we can’t do that.”

Later, he shared an interview with Australian neo-Nazi Tom Sewell about “his arrest, white nationalism, and Adolf Hitler.” He found the interview “interesting.”

Clearly, that’s exactly the kind of contributor Cormier-Denis is looking for and invites to appear on Nomos-TV.

Our self-proclaimed intellectual is not, however, immune to mood swings. In particular, he complains about the questionable practices of Dutrizac and QUB Radio, which he claims stole his material without credit, and about the hate speech moderation policies of the very Nazi-friendly platform X/Twitter, which he claims are still too “woke” for his taste.

We’ll see where all this leads this “journalist.” Probably to at least one more AI-generated article on his crappy website, where the “antifas” will once again be portrayed as the devil incarnate.

 

Conclusion

After this painful foray into the sordid depths of French-Canadian ethnonationalist consciousness, let’s take a moment to return to the question Benoît Dutrizac posed to Alexandre Cormier-Denis on April 27, 2026:

[Are you afraid that your comments might veer into outright racism, that people might say, ‘All these immigrants—we need to kick them all out! Anyone who isn’t white and Catholic—we need to throw them all out!’ Aren’t you afraid of sparking that kind of simplistic thinking?]

ACD, of course, replied that he wasn’t afraid of that, because people are “capable of seeing the nuances,” and Dutrizac accepted this politically expedient answer and moved on to the next question.

With this article, we believe we have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that racism is not a glitch in the ideological program of Cormier-Denis and Nomos-TV but, rather, constitutes one of its core functions. This has been glaringly obvious to us for a very long time, and we hope that the demonstration provided above will dispel any remaining ambiguity in this regard.

As of this writing, the video of ACD’s appearance on Dutrizac has garnered over 23,000 views on YouTube and more than 800 comments, almost all of which are not only positive but often very enthusiastic: “100,000% agree with him,” “what an incredibly intelligent man,” and so on. The comments call for him to be invited back often, or even to be offered a weekly segment on QUB! There are also one-word comments—“remigration”—accompanied by images of airplanes, which receive knowing replies like “bye-bye,” “oh, yes indeed,” etc. Some exclaim, “I’m a Quebécois, and this makes me feel more at home!!!!” to which others respond with a reference to the Nomos-TV website.

There can be no question that Dutrizac helped bring Cormier-Denis into the public eye and amplified his racist message. No one forced him to give ACD a platform. It was a conscious choice made by him and his team. When a radio or television host claims to hate “all extremes” but laments above all the imagined censorship or violence of the far left, only to then give a platform to one of the most unapologetic members of Québec’s far right, one must question his professional ethics and the substance of his beliefs.

 

Whatever people may say, anti-wokeness is essentially a cultural backlash against the legitimate demands of feminist and anti-racist movements and other groups seeking equality. For many years, this reactionary undercurrent has gained significant traction in Québec’s media landscape, particularly on conservative commercial radio in the Québec City region and in the Québecor media group through the writings of columnists and editorialists too numerous to list here. You know who they are.

Perhaps it is time for all these people to pause for a moment and consider their social responsibility and ask themselves just how far they are willing to go in their disgraceful pursuit of a culture war against the much-maligned progressive left. The way things are going, they can hardly deny that they are playing into the hands of fascists.

 

 

---

[1] Over the past year, Dutrizac has also welcomed to his show Alice Cordier from the French far-right women’s group Némésis, as well as the pseudo-journalists from Rebel News—the latter on several occasions.